Super Lawyers
Consumer Attorneys California
AV Preeminent
State Bar of California
American Association for Justice

Conflict of Interest Asserted More Often in Disability Lawsuits

Sean M. Anderson, a University of Illinois researcher, studied employee-benefits litigation that occurred from 2006 to 2010 and found that more than 60 percent of federal cases involving five kinds of benefits were based on long-term disability insurance claims. This finding is all the more interesting because private employees participated in long-term disability plans far less often than they did in the other kinds of benefit offerings.

According to a news release on the university’s website citing federal statistics from 2009, only 31 percent of private employees joined long-term disability plans, as compared to short-term disability (38 percent), qualified pension plans (51 percent), medical benefit plans (52 percent) and life insurance (57 percent).

Disability Insurance Generates More Litigation

Anderson, who studies “employee benefit plan policy and regulation,” mused that “as a society, we’re spending a disproportionate amount of judicial resources on resolving disputes about this one type of plan, even though it’s not the most common one out there.”

He reportedly looked at “hundreds” of federal ERISA lawsuits in this research.

The Conflict-of-Interest Issue

We have written in this space often about the problem of the inherent conflict of interest that disability insurers have in these claims. As Anderson described it, “It’s an insurance company that administers the plan, that decides on the claim, and ultimately has to foot the bill if the benefit is granted … a conflict of interest that everyone can easily see …”

Perhaps not surprisingly then, the study found that plaintiffs raised the issue of the insurance company’s conflict of interest more often in disability suits than in those based on other types of plans.

To Settle or Not to Settle

Anderson also found that lawsuits involving disability insurance settle at a higher rate than those involving other benefit plans.

At our law firm, we represent disability claimants in their quests for benefits after their insurance companies denied or terminated benefits. It is true that while a claimant may decide to settle his or her case, each case is unique, and many factors go into such a decision. In appropriate cases, we do not hesitate to advocate for the claimant’s disability benefits in court.

Client Reviews
Just when I thought there was no hope to recover my LTD benefits, I found attorney Constantin Roboostoff. With his expertise, I was able to recover all of my back long term disability benefits. Other attorneys wouldn’t take my case because it wasn’t cut and dry. Mr. Roboostoff took the challenge and did an incredible job. Not only did he get my current disability benefits going, he also recovered all my back benefits. He was a true blessing and I would recommend him whole heartedly. CW
It was my pleasure to make contact with Scott Kalkin three years ago after other lawyers had turned me away and told me I would not succeed in my lawsuit. Thanks to Scott's thoroughness, dedication, and diligence, my lawsuit WAS successful and he saw me through to the end, which included putting legal pressure on the insurance company which had invested so much time, personnel, and money, in not paying me what was due. RB
As soon as I met with Scott, I could tell he was knowledgeable, resourceful, experienced, highly professional, and would be dedicated to getting me fair treatment. Scott has handled all interactions with my insurance company ever since. Being able to rely on him to represent me has been a huge relief for a chronically ill person. SO