The firm of Roboostoff & Kalkin conducts an active civil appellate practice. Scott Kalkin has represented clients in over one hundred appellate cases and has the experience, knowledge and communications skills necessary to succeed.
Our firm represents clients in civil appellate cases involving:
Roboostoff & Kalkin welcomes civil appeal inquiries and referrals from individuals and law firms. Contact us for a free initial consultation.Experienced San Francisco Civil Appeals Lawyers
Scott Kalkin has over 25 years of extensive experience in the appellate courts, having handled more than 100 appellate actions. These have included appeals in four of California’s six state appellate districts, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and the Unites States Supreme Court.
In his most recent appellate victory, Blankenship v. Liberty Life, Mr. Kalkin successfully protected a verdict in favor of his client that he had initially won at trial in federal court in the Northern District of California.
Mr. Kalkin is a former director and president of the San Francisco Trial Lawyers Association and has also served as a judge pro tem for the San Francisco and San Mateo County Superior Courts since 1990. Scott Kalkin has received the AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 rating* from Martindale-Hubbell. In addition, he was selected for inclusion in the Northern California Super Lawyers list in 2008.The Skills Needed to Succeed
Scott Kalkin has the skills necessary to successfully litigate your civil appeal. These include thoroughness and attention to detail, the ability to identify key legal issues, and strong writing and oral argument skills. In your case, Mr. Kalkin will work diligently to develop a well-crafted and persuasively argued appeal.Free Consultation With an Attorney
* AV Preeminent and BV Distinguished are certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the confidential opinions of members of the Bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell ratings fall into two categories — legal ability and general ethical standards.